Public Law - Ministerial Responsibilty and Coalition Governments Essay

Public Law - Ministerial Responsibilty and Coalition Governments - Essay Example? Sociologists believe that this policy-making phenomenon in most states in Britain could also happen in Westminster as officials have introduced a semi-proportional electoral system which, it argued, would entail frequent, if not permanent, nuclear fusion reaction although electoral reform seems near to nil. 2 Anent to this phenomena is the recent hold up of the British parliament to publish a Cabinet Manual that will contain a battle array of statutes, court judgments and treaties which they considered as first ever written legal convention and precedent on how UK is turn overan attempt toward codification. These developments in the semipolitical argonna must be scrutinized by electorates to be abreast with presidency activity officials plans. It is also in this context that we will explore issues relating to workability of concretion of government viz-a-viz its ministerial duties as well as th e proposed codification of conventions, which is largely perceived as unnecessary. 1. Coalition Government executable? That question has been raised by a British columnist at the height of electoral controversies in 2010. It seems that the question remained unsettled since hodge-podge of discourse revived the theme as election nears again. But what is a partnership government? Why does it attempt to question the competence and capacity of the single partys disposal especi everyy in matters that relate to fairness and representation? 3 Coalition government is a small-arm of several political parties cooperating to govern a country or a region. 4 It removes an elite unitary system of political decision-makings and allowed democratization of political discourse by tolerating convergence and intra-party agreements. It is often a structural consequence whenever there are economic problems, unpeace, and political events such as merging of political parties during election. Practical ly, coalition government permeates sharing of executive powers and therefore changes the paradigms broadens political party behaviors widen operational methods in political science including internal rules of political engagements within the administration. 5 But these changes are neither worrisome nor irrelevant because all countries worldwide evolved from monarchical or unitary toward two or multi-party coalitions to democratize governance. 6 Nousiainen and Blondel (1993) have one time asserted that coalitions can be more or less extreme, more or less ideologically diverse, and composed of partners who are more or less equal. The system espoused collective cabinet responsibility and legislated policies are credited to the government. 7 Policies will therefore be attributed to the government collectively and they expect stringent legislative discipline, unless theyd agree to exercise freely their respective votes during decision-making. Last year, UK officials formed a coalitiong overnment after serious discussions between the Conservative Partyand theLiberal Democrats. 8 Observers however thought that this coalition politics have focused so much on selection instead of accountability perceiving that its political survival is considerably dependent from electoral process. 9 Political critics argued that government coalition, for it to be workable, should be build on trust. Some political shenanigans however bared experiences of alleged serial infidelity of Liberal Democrats, thereof it is likely that government will be riddled with mutual